What is truth? Who is God? What is the meaning of life? On this blog we explore the interactions between Christianity and real life in the real world. The word says we are called to love God and love others. Jesus Christ is God come to us; He is alive. God will call all of us to give an explanation of how we lived. Trust in Jesus and receive forgiveness; a new life. Stand for the truth. Glorify Christ in how you live. A new world awaits.
Friday, December 5, 2014
Gifts of the Spirit in the Church: And diagnostics of the Lost
I can't help but notice certain patterns in the people and groups around me. Of course people are more complex than stereotypes, but there are certain observable patterns that do emerge, and tend to be at least somewhat accurate in describing people groups.
What do people think about Jesus? There are a lot of words said. Sometimes devout people say wonderful things about Jesus. Sometimes depraved people make sharp contrasts between Jesus and his followers. Sometimes great men make sharp claims regarding religion. But what's really going on beneath the surface? I thought describing what I notice in those who attend and don't attend church might be interesting, and fun. So these are some "people groups" I notice emerging as I attend church, and simply talk with people about Jesus. I'm not trying to be mean, just reporting what I notice.
Twenty broad general people groups, 10 doing the right things, 10 doing the wrong things, enjoy!
The Not Interested Crowd - This is by far the large majority in the United States. They don't have anything to say about Christianity. It's all about entertainment for the people in this crowd. Television, videogames, sports, raunchy humor, cars, anime, movies, big trucks, clubs, bars, alcohol, and sex. During the week it's about working to survive and on weekends it's about drinking and getting laid. The tavern is really the worship event for this group. They go to the tavern and worship women, men, relationships, or sexual activity. If asked, they have no interest, and not really any opinion on it either. Christianity seems to have nothing to do with their lives.
Sleeper Professionals - This is the middle class and upper class crowd. They're well educated, and their life is a balance of appearances, classy entertainment, and self importance. This is the crowd that wears nice clothes, and does trendy things like "go to a local coffee shop" or "have a glass wine after a meal" or "have a dinner party with colleagues." These men and women have clear pictures in their mind of what it means to be happy and satisfied. They strive very hard for the perfect home, the perfect mate, the perfect job, and all the right opinions about them in the community. Sometimes they achieve all of those balances only to find, there is still something missing. Some in this crowd may also be cultural Christians, who recognize they need a belief in a higher power, but don't want it interfering in their picturesque lifestyle too much.. Sometimes these are the people driving the nice jet black cars with tinted windows with the "darwin" fish plate on the back. These are the people who love to be thought of as "tolerant." They also love the idea of all religions leading to the same place, and think spirituality is great, but religion is bad.
Dead Walking - These kinds of people you see around, and they tend to look like zombies. They've lived as sleepers or not interested so long, eventually their souls have died internally. But they still shamble about, working at the gas station, or shopping for groceries, maybe occasionally in a stressful fit, the rest of the time, jaw dropped, kind of shambling about in old age, dead on the inside, still walking on the outside. You'll notice them staring at their phone, texting, or walking along with a blank look on their face. Sometimes they'll be in a rush, upset. Other times they'll be waiting in line with that blank frown on their face. We've all seen them about I'm sure!
The Addict - This is the one I used to be. The addict (alcoholic) was always in search of something that could fill the hole in their chest, that missing something in their lives. That missing something was God all along, but they thought they had found it in a particular drug, like alcohol, adderall, prozac, painkillers, xanax, dextromethorphan or even harder stuff like cocaine, meth, or heroin, and before they knew it the drug had sucked them into a seemingly unbreakable addiction. Most people who reach the addiction stage will eventually die in some complication related to that addiction, but some may be found, perhaps through a church, counseling, or a 12 step group where they realizing that missing piece is God. But few have that chance, since the addiction changes the personality so drastically over years. Change is tough.
The Passive Rebel - These are the people who are agnostic or atheist, but don't think about it a lot. They generally look for satisfaction in other parts of life, like work, and mainly, in relationships and sexuality. They don't necessarily have a vendetta against God, but they do actively evade and flee from any mention of God or any suggestion of accountability. When cornered and asked about God, they may lash out, or simply sarcastically say something about "unicorns" or "leprechauns" and laugh in your face, or simply politely say that they don't believe in any sort of God.
The Active Rebel - These are the warrior atheists, who are quite active in their hatred for God. They are sometimes part of atheist groups, they love evolution and science, and they often attack Christians and their views. This is the group in active and intense rebellion against God. They don't flee God, they shout in his face and mock him. They fight very hard against a God they say doesn't exist, ironically. Perhaps even more ironically, is that they are probably closer to finding God than any of the previously mentioned groups, because of their interest in the topic. These are the people that I love, and I try to form friendships with. Scientism tends to be their religion, an all encompassing faith in the doctrines of science.
The Seeker - the seeker is a sight to behold. And despite what strict Calvinists will tell you, people do indeed seek out and find God (Deuteronomy 4:29, Proverb 8:17, Matthew 7:7). The seeker is looking for the truth. Of course the seeker will never find it without the help of the Holy Spirit. I experienced it, when in my own sort of understanding of a vague spirituality, Jesus Christ intersected and found me where I was. The seeker knows the answer is in spirituality, and the Spirit will often notice this person seeking out, and intersect with that person on their journey and point them to Jesus. I love seekers.
The Flashy CEO - This is the ministry leader in the Christian church who is good at appearing devout, but struggles with pride and does much of his or her work in the church for personal gain and a sense of importance. These folks love to look good in suits, and like to be at the center of attention, important; high profile influencers. Any Christian with a good eye can see through these types. If you walk into a church and this person is the pastor.. walk back out. False teachers the Bible calls them.
The Hard Christian - These are the strict Calvinists, theological bullies you might call them. They come after people about sin. They argue over minor theological issues. They spend a lot of time judging others. When they talk to you they tend to come off as pushy, intense, and somewhat phony. They have excellent head knowledge and can rail off verses like nobodies business, but they don't have a lot of love or mercy to give anyone. Some are outright pharisees, some are just misguided bullies who don't pray enough. These are generally the Christians who creep you out and get into shouting matches with non-believers.
The Soft Christian - The soft Christian goes to church every week, but doesn't really live the Christian life. You could call them cultural Christians. They come to church, they may even pray or study their Bible occasionally, but they are highly wrapped up in sin. They sleep around, they smoke cigarettes, they drink, and they party. They miss church sometimes, sometimes they stop coming all together. They may be backsliding believers, believers who have lost their salvation due to constant sin, or they may be strong believers who simply haven't connected their internal beliefs with their outward actions. This is generally the majority of people in most churches I've attended. They're quiet, they believe, but they don't live it too well.
The Disciple Maker - Now let's get into some of the positive ones. The disciple maker is an interpersonal master. They tend to lead Bible studies or small groups, and they always seem to have someone underneath their wing that they're teaching and building up in the faith. They're extroverted and love to celebrate the goodness of Jesus. It's a real joy to see the disciplemaker at work. They truly love Jesus with passion.
The Prayer Warrior - This is the Christian who never gets enough praise in this world for their actions. They are in strong obedience to the call of the Bible to "pray continuously." They often participate in prayer group, and they tend to be encouragers and unofficial counselors and supporters to those in the congregation. They tend to do a lot of quiet things for the Lord that don't draw a lot of attention like donating to charity, volunteering, and praying for every single person they see or have seen. What a wonderful, beautiful meekness in the prayer warrior. Their connection to God is quite special, and so deep it's like a precious mystery to behold.
The Devout Evangelist - this warrior for Christ has a need within his or her own heart, a conviction, that everyone can and should know Jesus Christ as Lord and savior. They know deep down that Jesus is the answer to all the problems of the world and all the brokenness. They desperately want others to know the peace of Christ. They see every social gathering or conversation as a chance to bring up Jesus and mention how great the Lord is. They genuinely love peace and take joy in showing mercy to those in need.
The Merciful Healer - This is the category that someone like Mother Teresa would fall into. Their chief purpose is to show mercy to everyone they meet that might be in pain or in need of healing. They don't have any room for judging or condemning. It doesn't even occur to them, they simply show mercy and show love, again and again. They are great listeners and comforters. Healers are beautiful Christ-like servants who think of others before themselves. Healers have hearts of gold. They naturally focus on listening, healing, and meeting needs in communities.
The Dedicated Missionary - These are the people who are either planning, on their way, or at work in a foreign mission field. They have a deep belief that they must go to a certain place, region, or country. They know it deep down because the Holy Spirit has placed it in their heart. And they find a way to go, and arrive, and work tirelessly for the cause of Christ in broken parts of the world. The missionary often seems mysterious to Christians, their intense dedication is shocking at times, but they know because the Spirit has told them to.. go. So they go.
The Activist Powerhouse - aka the prophet role. These people are on a divine mission to expose evil (Eph 5:11) and fight for the cause of Christ on Earth. Some hard Christians think they are the prophet role, but are simply noisy gong condemners. There is a fine line, and on the activist powerhouse side is a devout belief in Jesus, a gentle humility, and a love for the truth that is the engine of their change power, fueled by the Holy Spirit. I love these guys and gals, they are the ones who can tell you right off what their mission is, and are simply dedicated. You can see it in their eyes. They may confront liberty issues, social problems, world hunger, political issues, or disease.
The Theologian - the theologian is a Bible master. He's studied, read, reread, and attempts to systematize and intuitively understand the culmination of all the books of the Bible. The theologian is creative and loves to glean new realities from a succinct understanding of scripture. His passion for the word of God is unparalleled. These are the men and women who live the word, yet they also seem to exist in the word. They think of life as a biblical existence. They see the reality beyond the illusion of the physical world: they exist in a biblical reality and see truth where others see only lies and false constructs of sin. They see God in beauty, in nature, in people, and in themselves. They live out the reality of God in community and creation.
The Soldier Defender - These are the people who love Christian apologetics, the reasonable defense of the Christian faith. They tend to fall into two subcategories, the analytical apologist and the intuitive apologist. Prime examples would be William Lane Craig and Ravi Zacharias. Dr. Craig focuses on the rational arguments more so while Dr. Zacharias focuses in on philosophy and beauty. The defender loves the gospel and it tends to itch them when skeptics attack the Bible and the idea of God. The defender loves to cross over into disciplines like science, history, archaeology, empiricism, and philosophy and prove the reliability of the Bible, the historicity of Jesus Christ, and the existence of God on the skeptics own terms. At the end of the day, the defender is the vital cultural warrior who seeks to show that the gospel of Christ is alive and relevant today, tomorrow and always. If Christianity in the United States is the city on the hill, the soldier defenders are the garrison of troops defending the city against a hostile culture.
The Peaceful Shepherd - Whenever this pastor, priest, deacon or leader speaks at services somewhere, the powerful peace and presence of Christ seems to descend like doves on the crowd. These men and women are in deep personal contact with the Lord; in a way many of us can hardly understand. When they speak it's like the scriptures come to life in the power of the Holy Spirit. If your leader is one of these, stick around, great teaching always follows.
The Reformer - If you're very lucky, in your life you may encounter one of these greats. Reformers include people like Martin Luther, John Calvin, Jacob Arminius, Mother Teresa, Francis of Assisi, Erasmus, Justin Martyr, Ravi Zacharias, Francis Schaefer, Billy Graham, Augustine, the Apostle Paul, the Apostle Peter, and of course Jesus Christ himself. They are game-changers. When they arrive and begin to work, it's like a watershed, a nexus, everything changes. These greats tend to be shockers in their pure devotion to God. Many of them are flawed (aside from Jesus) yet they have a vital message that changes the world forever. They inspire people. They tend to be creative. They also tend to be able to see through all the nonsense, to the purest teaching of the Bible. Reformers are able to translate the truth into real world application seamlessly.
Of course no one fits any one of these 'categories' perfectly. But certain people do come to mind as we imagine each description of people groups. I don't mean to judge or condemn, but only to point out certain observations that might be helpful to those wondering about where they are at, and what part they have to play in the kingdom. Can you think of other groups you might've noticed inside or outside the church? Leave a comment describing that group. Just don't leave a comment saying you "don't like labels." Everyone uses labels. My name, Justin Steckbauer, is a label. The name of the place where I work is a label. The name of the food I'll eat for dinner is a label. Everything has a label, and that's a good thing, otherwise we'd have nothing to talk about. Thanks for reading, take care and God bless!
Related Posts:
Proverbs Chapter 20: Wisdom from God's Book
Connection in love, it's what Life is all about
Can you see through the illusion?
The Power of the Christian Soldier
The Adaptable and Versatile Church of the Ages
Sunday, November 30, 2014
The Ultimate Balance: Resting Faith in Christ & Taking Dutiful Action
![]() |
| Blake's depiction of Jacob's ladder, I have a print of this painting mounted on the wall above the spot where I fell to my knees in my disaster and cried out to Jesus (two years ago) |
Hebrews 10:24 And let us consider how to stir up one another to love and good works
In life there is often a balance we must seek after, finding good measures of various attitudes and actions to find a happy medium in life. The struggle to find this difficult balance can best be summed in the shortened version of the serenity prayer:
God grant me the serenity
to accept the things I cannot change;
courage to change the things I can;
and wisdom to know the difference.
This is a difficult balance for anyone to maintain in this world. I've struggled greatly with this dilemma myself. How much do I rest in God and his plan? Conversely, how much do I take action and do the necessary foot work?
These two questions will determine the level of peace I have in my heart. If I step too far into the side of resting faith in God, my actions and activism begin to drop off and eventually that damages my faith. If I step too far into the realm of action and attempting change I run the risk of losing my peace in the hopelessness of changing situations outside my control.
What is the healthy balance?
We're asking the question of balance. This is fundamental, but how little it seems to be discussed. What can I change and what can't I change? How does peace of mind and calling to action play into the equation of daily life?
This is a very difficult one for me. Because I'm very sensitive to this kind of thing.
When I read a news story about Monsanto pouring millions of dollars into ads to prevent GMO labeling, it just slays me. It slays me because I know it's so wrong, on so many levels. When I read about the 20+ lobbyists in the Obama administration, I just want to lay down in a corner and collapse internally. It's terrible. And most people just don't know, and they don't care, and they don't want to know. When I see Christian organizations praising what a great president George W. Bush was, I feel sick to my stomach. I recall the Iraq war, the Patriot act, the financial industry bailout, and the constant corruption bubbling out of that administration and my spirit just cries out to the Lord: "How can it be? How can it be this lost?"
It breaks my heart you see. The United States, the Christian nation, having been so plundered inside and out, so corrupted in politics, in banking, in media, and in business. It slays me every time.
Even further, the slanted news reporting the mainstream media news, Fox, CNN, all the rest. It's scary, how the truth never comes out. How lies become truth! Even further, to the hollywood industry, how stars like Justin Bieber and Miley Cyrus are used to turn the kids who idolize them into drug addicted, sex crazy immoral monsters. Monsters that will later be wielded against the former Christian majority. I can hardly handle it day by day.
And still, even further, before my very eyes, where I work at the shelter, watching people stuck in the same old patterns, same old addictions, they leave, they come back, they get sober, they relapse, it's enough to drive a man completely insane with the existential horror of it all. This is a very ugly world! And I haven't even mentioned war, disease, genocide, or world hunger yet. Wild!
What is peace? How can we have it? I'm known to go too far into action, and not far enough into resting trust. On the other end of the spectrum are those who take too little action in response to their faith in God. The Bible says such faith is useless (James 2:26).
There are many dualities in this world, and in ourselves, and even in our God:
- Jesus came full of grace and truth.
- God the Father is mercifully forgiving, and a just judge.
- The Holy Spirit both comforts us and convicts us.
- There is a time to love people and show mercy, and another time to explain the truth and give justice.
What can I change? If I can change it, then I will champion it as my cause.
What can't I change? If I can't change it, then I must accept it as it is.
John 16:33 says I have said these things to you, that in me you may have peace. In the world you will have tribulation. But take heart; I have overcome the world.”
And as it says in Mark 6:31 "And he said to them, “Come away by yourselves to a desolate place and rest a while.” For many were coming and going, and they had no leisure even to eat."
There is a time to act, and a time to rest.
Ecclesiastes 3:1-8 (ESV) "For everything there is a season, and a time for every matter under heaven: a time to be born, and a time to die; a time to plant, and a time to pluck up what is planted; a time to kill, and a time to heal; a time to break down, and a time to build up; a time to weep, and a time to laugh; a time to mourn, and a time to dance; a time to cast away stones, and a time to gather stones together; a time to embrace, and a time to refrain from embracing"
Do you recall what Jesus said? An often debated passage. He said, "You are the salt of the earth, but if salt has lost its taste, how shall its saltiness be restored? It is no longer good for anything except to be thrown out and trampled under people's feet. “You are the light of the world. A city set on a hill cannot be hidden. Nor do people light a lamp and put it under a basket, but on a stand, and it gives light to all in the house. In the same way, let your light shine before others, so that they may see your good works and give glory to your Father who is in heaven" (Matthew 5:13-16).
Salt and light. Preservation and hope. Another interesting statement by Jesus is in Matthew 24:6 when he says "And you will hear of wars and rumors of wars. See that you are not alarmed, for this must take place, but the end is not yet."
I find myself challenged by the teachings of Jesus over and over again. I'm to be a man of good conduct, loving those around me. But what of the corruption? The Bible says to expose the deeds of evil (Ephesians 5:11). So God likes whistle-blowers! Yet when I see the evil, the wars and rumors of war, do not be surprised. These things must happen. And also recall that the end must come, as described in the book of Revelation. So I should just let evil things happen and trust that it's part of God's plan? What if Europe and the United States had taken that attitude in 1939 when Nazi Germany, Italy, and Japan decided they wanted to conquer the world? We'd be living under a Nazi government today. And it could've easily looked that way to Christians in the 1930s. Hitler would appear to be the anti-Christ, and the time had come for the end. But that wasn't the case. So it's difficult to understand the balance between action (James 3:13) and resting faith (Psalm 62:5).
Even more challenging are the words of Paul in Romans when he writes regarding the convening authorities being set up for your good, and to obey them (Romans 13:1-7). That is one of the most challenging statements in the Bible to me. Almost every authority figure in my life, since I was very young has not been out to protect me for my own good, but out to harm me for their own desires. Paul himself suffered greatly at the hands of the convening authorities. He would've known clearly in his own mind that they are not set up for the good of any Christian, but the good of the rich to the plundering of the poor. But by that interpretation, the American Revolution was wrong? That can't be the case, can it? Were the British convening authorities working for the good of the colonists? They weren't. And the colonists rebelled, successfully.
I don't want to float too far from the topic of balance in faith and action, but it's an interesting question. The point is there is a balance in scripture. Some might jump to the conclusion that there are outright contradictions in scripture, but that is not the case. The instructions and principles in scripture are multidimensional, and must be interpreted in the sense of looking at a 3-dimensional image, one side at a time. While mercy and judgement may seem to be contradiction, they are not. They are vitally linked. Multifaceted. Much like love and justice. Everybody loves love. At the same time, everybody loves justice. They are both good things, but they are quite different. Everyone wants mercy for themselves, and judgment for those that hurt them. It's all about balancing the dualities in scripture.
God, within his divine character has the perfect amount of mercy and the perfect amount of judgement. He applies them in perfect amounts to fit every situation. The unrepentant villain receives judgement, the sinner who comes to the cross receives mercy. It's all contingent on our actions.
Bearing that in mind, how can we choose resting faith, and also choose action?
James 3:18 And a harvest of righteousness is sown in peace by those who make peace.
We must sow peace. For you gen z kids, "sowing" is when you plant a seed in the ground. That's where most food comes from. Dirt. We plant our good deeds in the dirt, and they grow over time into a harvest of righteousness, bringing peace to our hearts. Blessed are the peacemakers.
Peace in the storms of life. Who could hope for such a rare thing? Most people I see today look half crazy. Running through life, hurrying along from this to that. Seems crazy. Like I woke up in a nightmare or something. The further I get from the world and it's values, the more I'm disturbed by what it does. Have you felt the same thing? I certainly have. It's come to the point that I find it generally disturbing to just go about my days. It's all so antithetical to what God would want a society to look like. I feel so powerless against it. The media is so powerful. The companies, the advertisers, the sex industry, all so powerful. It sucks. I wish I could flip a switch and make it all ok. But God is letting this thing play out. He's letting it get real ugly before Jesus returns. Why? I'm not sure really. I wish it was over today. I wish the kingdom would come. I'm ready, my faith in Jesus is here and I know with that faith, I am clean before my maker.
Life is a balancing act. In the past I've lived by the misguided motto "All things to excess." Some people live there lives that way and never find out there is another way. I've found out. I've gotta unplug myself from the world, while still remaining in the world, offering the way out to those who could want it. There are so few that seem to. Yet there are many. The remainder of an unbalanced equation. With God all things are possible. When the world drives me nuts, I need to step back and realize that God is in charge. Some things I can change, most of it, I can't change. So then I will accept them as they are today, as I am today, and rest in the knowledge that I live in the extended grace of God, through faith in Christ Jesus.
Romans 12:12 Rejoice in hope, be patient in tribulation, be constant in prayer.
Saturday, November 29, 2014
Kenotic Christology: The Example Christ set in Communion with and Reliance upon the Father and Spirit (Academic)
KENOTIC CHRISTOLOGY:
THE eXAMPLE cHRIST SET IN cOMMUNION WITH AND RELIANCE UPON THE fATHER AND
sPIRIT
Justin Steckbauer
LUO THEO350
November 24, 2014
In the
history of theology over the ages, many doctrines have been debated, disputed
and fought over. One area of particular
importance to theology is Christology, the study of the nature and person of
Jesus Christ. Christology is to many the
most important field of Theology, because it deals with the person at the very
center of history, life, and divinity, the blessed Lord Jesus Christ. At the very heart of Christology is the
understanding that Jesus Christ is both fully human and fully God. This doctrine was first formally accepted at
the Council of Chalcedon, in the year AD 451 (Boyd, 2009, p. 112). The question of how Jesus Christ can be fully
God and full man has puzzled theologians over the ages. In present day evangelicalism, the debate has
fallen into two broad categories: the classical view and the kenotic view
(Boyd, 2009, p. 112). The Classical view
holds that while Jesus Christ walked the earth as the God-man, he carried with
him his entire divinity and yet mysteriously also remained entirely human
(Boyd, 2009, p. 113). The Kenotic view
holds that Jesus Christ relinquished, or emptied himself of his divine
attributes while he walked the Earth, yet of course was still entirely holy and
full of grace and truth (Boyd, 2009, p. 113).
The Zondervan Illustrated Bible Dictionary calls the
interpretation of this theological issue “profoundly difficult” (Douglas &
Tenney, 2011, p. 802). A great deal has
been written on the theological issue of the mystery of the Incarnation of the
God-man. Never the less, this essay will
attempt to demonstrate that the Kenotic view is the correct understanding of
the God-man.
The
Classic View
Philippians 2:5-9 (ESV) says “Have
this mind among yourselves, which is yours in Christ Jesus, 6 who, though he was in the form of God, did not
count equality with God a thing to be grasped, 7 but
emptied himself, by taking the form of a servant, being born in the likeness of
men. 8 And being found in human form, he humbled
himself by becoming obedient to the point of death, even death on a
cross.” In the way Christ lived, he
fulfilled his own teaching recorded in Matthew 23:12 (ESV) which states “Whoever exalts himself will be humbled, and whoever
humbles himself will be exalted.” Those
holding the classical view have pointed to Paul's desire to describe the
contrast between Jesus (the second Adam who overcame sin), and the first Adam
who yielded to sin (Terry, 1901, p. 293).
Those of the classic view tend to believe that the statement “emptied
himself” does not refer to a changing of Christ's divine attributes, but is an
allusion to Christ's humbling himself in his life and his death on the cross
(Terry, 1901, p. 295). Those of the
classic view hold that their view best explains divine humility (Pardue, 2012,
p.271). The primary debate centers
around Philippians chapter two. The
Greek word “kenosis” actually never occurs in the NT, but the cognate verb
“kenoo” does occur in Philippians 2:7 (Douglas & Tenney, 2011, p.
802). The classic view holds to a more
figurative interpretation of the Greek word “kenoo” (Douglas & Tenney, 2011,
p. 802). But there are many scriptures
that must be taken into account. The
synoptic gospels give theologians the detailed facts on the ministry of Jesus
Christ on Earth. We must examine those
gospels to understand the mystery of the God-man.
Jesus
the Man
The important question is: Was Jesus limited in his divine
attributes during his time on Earth? It
is recorded in the gospel of Mark that in response to a lack of belief in
certain areas Jesus was unable to perform but limited miracles (Mark 6:5). Jesus also demonstrated an ability to be
surprised (Mark 6.6). Jesus was unable
to prevent many of his followers from no longer following him (John 6:66). A very powerful statement by Jesus Christ
himself in Mark 13:32 (ESV) says “But concerning that day or that hour, no one
knows, not even the angels in heaven, nor the Son, but only the Father.” Jesus did not know the time of his
return. He never ceased being God, but he
did surrender certain measures of his divine attributes. The lack of knowledge demonstrated by Jesus
in certain cases is a clear indication that some sort of change took place in
his nature (Loke, 2012, p. 583). The
limited knowledge of Jesus is perhaps the most important aspect of the kenotic
view, because it shows a clear contradiction, one cannot have omniscience and
limited knowledge at the same time, it doesn't make sense (Loke, 2012, p.
584). Atheists have claimed that the
incarnation, the paradox of the God-man is incoherent and impossible as
described in the classic view (Loke, 2012, p. 584). In that case, they would be correct. It is a logical contradiction. Therefore the Kenotic view provides a model that
is not necessarily logically contradictory.
When Jesus came, he came as a man, entirely human, choosing to adopt the
role of a servant, despite all of his glory.
As it was recorded in Isaiah 53:2: “For he grew up before him like a
young plant, and like a root out of dry ground; he had no form or majesty that
we should look at him, and no beauty that we should desire him.”
Jesus
the God
Similar to Karl Barth's view of the God-man, there is no
need for Jesus to be considered any less than God while relinquishing or
veiling certain divine attributes (McCormack, 2006, p. 248). Isaiah perceived the coming of the God-man in
this way: “For to us a child is born, to us a son is given; and the government
shall be upon his shoulder, and his name shall be called Wonderful Counselor,
Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace” (Isaiah 9:6). John wrote of Jesus in this way: “In the
beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God” (John
1:1). John 1:18 (ESV) states “No one has
ever seen God; the only God, who is at the Father's side, he has made him
known.” While Jesus Christ seemed to be
limited in his divine abilities during his time on Earth, he also performed
many miracles (Matthew 9:2-8, 9:20-22, 9:27-30, 14:15-21, 14:25-27, Mark
2:3-12, Luke 7:12-15, John 11:38-44).
While the miracles were probably done through the power of the Spirit
with the guidance of God the Father, none the less, Jesus Christ remained fully
God, whether as a human, or crucified, or resurrected and glorified.
Kenoticism
The Kenotic view on the Incarnation can be broken up in to
many variants and differing views (Elwell, 2001, p. 651). It is possible that Jesus lived his human
life entirely emptied of divine attributes and simply did miracles by the power
of the Holy Spirit within him, through the blessing and guidance of the Father
(Douglas & Tenney, 2011, p. 803). It
is also possible that Jesus exercised divine attributes specifically assigned
to him by the Father and willingly gave up the rest of his divine attributes
(McCormack, 2006, p. 246). The doctrine
that Jesus gave up all of his divine attributes can be considered strong
ontological Kenoticism (Loke, 2012, p. 586).
This view is held and defended prominently by Wolfgang Friedrich Gess a
German Theologian (Loke, 2012, p. 587).
The position that Jesus relinquished certain divine attributes while
retaining others can be considered standard ontological Kenoticism (Loke, 2012,
p. 586). The third position would be
that Jesus Christ entirely carried all of his divine attributes but did not
exercise them during his earthly ministry, which can be considered Functional
Kenoticism (Loke, 2012, p. 586). The
kenotic view began in the writings of Gottfried Thomasius in the 1800s, and was
formed into a coherent theology in Germany and England in the late 1800s and
early 1900s (Elwell, 2001, p. 651-652).
The
Interaction of the Trinity during the Earthly life of Jesus Christ
Jesus Christ during his earthly ministry came primarily for
the reason of living a perfect sinless life, and dying on the cross for the
sins of mankind (John 12:27). But it can
also be said that Jesus came to set an example of how his followers should live
(John 18:37). If that were not true, he
would not have taught, but simply given his life at the appropriate time. But instead Jesus Christ taught and performed
miracles, and before his ascension delivered the Holy Spirit to his followers,
commissioning them as missionaries to the world (Acts 1:7-8). Along those lines of thinking, it is
reasonable to believe that Jesus Christ was literally setting the example not
only in his words, but also in his actions.
He demonstrated and spoke to his total reliance upon the Father while he
was on Earth. John 5:19 (ESV) says “So
Jesus said to them, “Truly, truly, I say to you, the Son can do nothing of his
own accord, but only what he sees the Father doing. For whatever the Father
does, that the Son does likewise.” Since
Jesus is God, why would he need to necessarily rely entirely upon the
Father? Jesus was setting a literal
example of how believers studying the gospels ought to live. In the same way perhaps Jesus interacted with
the Holy Spirit much as the Holy Spirit uses believers today to continue to
carry the message of Christ and perform good works. Jesus himself did say that even greater works
would be done by his disciples than those he did (John 14:12). Of course Jesus was most certainly referring
to his miracles and evangelism work, not his atonement for sins on the
cross. Jesus taught a great deal, and
set the example for Christians by his perfect actions. To fully embrace the act of being a human and
setting that example must then include relinquishing certain divine
attributes.
Jesus did many miracles while on Earth. Did he do those miracles by his own power, by
the power of the Father, or by the Holy Spirit?
Did Jesus have the Spirit during his ministry? Isaiah 11:2 (ESV) says “And the Spirit of the
Lord shall rest upon him, the Spirit of wisdom and understanding, the Spirit of
counsel and might, the Spirit of knowledge and the fear of the Lord.” Isaiah prophesied about the coming of Jesus
Christ and the Spirit resting upon him.
In addition John 1:32 (ESV) says “Then John testified, "I saw the
Holy Spirit descending like a dove from heaven and resting upon him.” Kenoticism rests upon the relinquishing of
divine attributes by Jesus Christ, by choice.
It can be inferred that the God-man relinquished certain divine
attributes, and performed his miracles by cooperation with the Holy Spirit,
with the blessing and guidance of God the Father.
Theologians
and their Views on Kenoticism
Gottfried Thomasius was the founder of the idea of kenotic
theology (Elwell, 2001, p. 651). He was
a Lutheran German theologian who lived from 1802 to 1875 (Elwell, 2001, p.
651). Charles Gore was another one of
the key defenders of the Kenotic view of the incarnation (Poidevin, 2013, p.
214). Gore took the text from
Philippians 2 as necessarily interpreted as an emptying of divine attributes so
that Christ would be fully human (Poidevin, 2013, p. 215). Karl Barth was a classic defender of the
position, but he did not even consider his view to be kenotic necessarily
(McCormack, 2006, p. 248). Barth was
absolutely set upon expounding the absolute deity of Christ, as God whether on
Earth or in heaven (McCormack, 2006, p. 248).
Barth believed that nothing need be subtracted from the God-man for him
to take on the role of a servant, and that he willfully veiled his attributes,
but nothing was subtracted; a similar position to Functional Kenoticism
(McCormack, 2006, p. 248). The kenotic
view of the incarnation is not necessarily an orthodox view, but it is a
biblically sound position and does not invalidate the statement of faith made
by the council of Chalcedron in 451 AD (McCormack, 2006).
Conclusion
In conclusion, the wide range of Kenotic views regarding the
Incarnation of the God-man provide a powerful theological understanding of the
mystery of our blessed Lord Jesus Christ.
The dimensions of interaction and humble reliance upon God the Father
and God the Spirit, shown by God our Lord Jesus Christ during his time on Earth
makes for a dynamic understanding of the mystery of the Trinity. Jesus Christ is Lord, and indeed lived the
perfect life as an example to all future Christians on how they ought to live:
in total reliance upon God the Father, through the power of the Holy Spirit,
upon the forgiveness found in the cross of Jesus Christ (Philippians
2:11). As the writer of Hebrews 2:9-17 (ESV) put it: “But we see him
who for a little while was made lower than the angels, namely Jesus, crowned
with glory and honor because of the suffering of death, so that by the grace of
God he might taste death for everyone.
For it was fitting that he, for whom and by whom all things exist, in
bringing many sons to glory, should make the founder of their salvation perfect
through suffering. For he who sanctifies and those who are sanctified all have
one source. That is why he is not ashamed to call them brothers, saying,“I will
tell of your name to my brothers; in the midst of the congregation I will sing
your praise.” And again, “I will put my trust in him.” And again, “Behold, I
and the children God has given me.” Since therefore the children share in flesh
and blood, he himself likewise partook of the same things, that through death
he might destroy the one who has the power of death, that is, the devil, 15 and
deliver all those who through fear of death were subject to lifelong slavery.
16 For surely it is not angels that he helps, but he helps the offspring of
Abraham. 17 Therefore he had to be made like his brothers in every respect, so
that he might become a merciful and faithful high priest in the service of God,
to make propitiation for the sins of the people.”
Bibliography
Boyd, Gregory A., and Paul R. Eddy. Across the Spectrum: Understanding Issues in Evangelical Theology. Grand Rapids,
Mich.: Baker Academic, 2002.
Douglas, J. D., and Merrill C. Tenney.
Zondervan Illustrated Bible Dictionary. 2nd ed. Grand Rapids, Mich.:
Zondervan, 2011.
ESV: Study Bible : English Standard Version. ESV Text ed. Wheaton, Ill.: Crossway Bibles, 2007.
Elwell, Walter A. Evangelical
Dictionary of Theology. 2nd ed. Grand Rapids, Mich.: Baker Book House,
2001.
Evans, C. Stephen. "Exploring Kenotic Theology: The Self Emptying of God." Oxford University Press
Xii (2006).
Loke, Andrew. "The Incarnation
and Jesus’ Apparent Limitation in Knowledge." New Blackfriars,
2012.
Lutzer, Erwin W. The Doctrines That Divide: A Fresh Look at the Historic Doctrines That Separate Christians.
Grand Rapids, MI: Kregel Publications, 1998.
McCormack, Bruce. "Karl Barth’sChristology as a Resource for a Reformed Version of Kenoticism." International
Journal of Systematic Theology 8, no. 3 (2006).
Pardue, Stephen. "Kenosis and ItsDiscontents: Towards an Augustinian Account of Divine Humility." Scottish
Journal of Theology, 2012.
Poidevin, Robin. "Kenosis, Necessity and Incarnation." The Heythrop Journal, 2013, 214-27.
Terry, Milton S. "The Great Kenotic Text." The Biblical World 17, no. 4 (1901): 292-96.
Related Posts:
Academic Paper: The Image of God
The Big Bang vs. Six-Day Creation
Academic Paper: The Holy Spirit as Guide, Preacher, and Indwelling in the Book of Acts
Academic Paper: Basics of the Faith, Book of Romans
Christians in Politics: A Brief Analysis of Issues in the USA - 2014
Related Posts:
Academic Paper: The Image of God
The Big Bang vs. Six-Day Creation
Academic Paper: The Holy Spirit as Guide, Preacher, and Indwelling in the Book of Acts
Academic Paper: Basics of the Faith, Book of Romans
Christians in Politics: A Brief Analysis of Issues in the USA - 2014
Sunday, November 23, 2014
Origin, Meaning, Morality, & Destiny: An atheist and a Christian square off on four qualifiers of a Worldview
Introduction:
Discussion and open dialogue are a wonderful aspect of a free society. To that end, a friend and I have gotten together to address the topic of worldview. Two worldviews will be examined, the Atheist perspective and the Christian perspective.
What makes up a worldview? The prompt I suggested was on four central topics, the four qualifiers of a worldview made popular by Dr. Ravi Zacharias, a Christian philosopher and writer.
The four areas were:
Origin - How does your worldview explain the origins of humanity?
Meaning - How is meaning described within your worldview?
Morality - What is the moral basis of your worldview?
Destiny - What is the future of your worldview?
A good friend of mine by the name of Jennifer Sternitzky was kind and gracious enough to step out and explain her worldview by these qualifiers, upon my request. Jennifer is a graduate of the University of Green Bay, with two degrees in Psychology and English. Jennifer is a feminist and a well read atheist. We've been friends for several years.
We decided upon approximately 750 words, one page, to describe the four points of worldview in a concise, direct manner. Enjoy.
The Atheist Perspective:
Jennifer Sternitzky, University of Green Bay
Origin: I believe in evolution, human and social. I believe humans evolved from apes, and apes evolved from…whatever they evolved from. I don’t pretend to understand everything in science or how evolution works, but I don’t believe there is a God (Christian or otherwise) or in any higher power. I believe we are the product of a series of mutations, enabling the ‘fittest’ to survive, though I do not believe humans are the ultimate beings. I believe we are part of a larger ecosystem and no living creature is above the other, though people certainly act like humans are the dominant creature. I suspect that somewhere along the way we’ll find a way to destroy ourselves—maybe even our planet. If we destroy ourselves, I suspect vegetation and animal life will repopulate the earth; whether humans ever re-emerge again, who knows.
The Christian Perspective:
Justin Steckbauer, Liberty University
Origin: The question of origin has puzzled man kind for centuries. How did we get here? Where did we come from? How did life come to be? For the Christian, the action and the process by which life came about, the length of years it took, the exact biological functions that brought about the complex human life form are less important than the first cause. Micro evolution, small changes in species that provide for adaptation, is beyond dispute. That is something science can measure and observe. In fact, I love science. However, macro evolution seems highly speculative, and the processes by which a puddle of amino acids could become a highly complex life form like a human are not observable. Given chance, matter, and time, a puddle of amino acids will never, ever become a human being. It is simply impossible, statistically. For the atheist, the first cause is a vacuum, an unanswered question: Where did energy come from? For the Christian, the first cause is a loving architect of the universe, a necessary first cause who over 10,000 years or 7 billion years, crafted the universe into existence.
Meaning: The question of meaning in Christianity is simple: We are children of the loving biologist, chemist, artist, writer, and architect, the designer of the human soul, who we call Father God. In that context, every human being has value, incredible value, so much that God would come, Jesus Christ, to offer himself as a path of redemption for his wayward people. In addition meaning, for the Christian, is a stark reality: The Earth is a very troubled place, and the problem is not outside ourselves, but within ourselves, and the only treatment is the indwelling presence of Jesus. In the context of meaning, we find a treasure trove in the Bible of meaning, and inherent worth.
Morality: What is the perfect moral code? Who had it? What does each moral code look like when put it into practical application? For atheism, we see Nazi Germany, with Nietzsche's idea of the superman put into practice. Genocide. Again in Russia, Stalin a former seminary student turned atheist, what do we find? The writing of Karl Marx used for the purpose of subjugation. Genocide. And what about the Christian worldview? The most prosperous countries on planet Earth, in contrast: Europe, and the United States. Now we see in the 21st century as Europe and the United States drift into post-modernism and naturalism, corruption begins to grow like a cancer.
The teaching of Jesus Christ is the perfection of morality described in powerfully simple terms: Love God and love others, as you love yourself. Jesus Christ provides the model for a life of humble service to others, that will always bring about the most peaceable and prosperous paradise, when practiced in truth.
Destiny: What future does an atheist have, after 100 years have passed? After 1000 years have gone by? The atheist passes out of existence into the natural and biological cycles of the environment. What future does the Christian have? Unending life, in community with a loving God and fellow believers who have chosen to fly in the face of everything the world says, and do it the way God says. Jesus Christ provides the way, he is the road, a personal savior present, willing to show you the hard truth about yourself, and offer a way of total redemption and a future unimaginably wonderful.
Related Posts:
Secular Views vs. Christian Truth
The Power of Love in Western Culture
Outlook for a Revived American Christianity
Questions on Salvation and God
Processing the Past and Being Restored
Discussion and open dialogue are a wonderful aspect of a free society. To that end, a friend and I have gotten together to address the topic of worldview. Two worldviews will be examined, the Atheist perspective and the Christian perspective.
What makes up a worldview? The prompt I suggested was on four central topics, the four qualifiers of a worldview made popular by Dr. Ravi Zacharias, a Christian philosopher and writer.
The four areas were:
Origin - How does your worldview explain the origins of humanity?
Meaning - How is meaning described within your worldview?
Morality - What is the moral basis of your worldview?
Destiny - What is the future of your worldview?
A good friend of mine by the name of Jennifer Sternitzky was kind and gracious enough to step out and explain her worldview by these qualifiers, upon my request. Jennifer is a graduate of the University of Green Bay, with two degrees in Psychology and English. Jennifer is a feminist and a well read atheist. We've been friends for several years.
We decided upon approximately 750 words, one page, to describe the four points of worldview in a concise, direct manner. Enjoy.
The Atheist Perspective:
Jennifer Sternitzky, University of Green Bay
Origin: I believe in evolution, human and social. I believe humans evolved from apes, and apes evolved from…whatever they evolved from. I don’t pretend to understand everything in science or how evolution works, but I don’t believe there is a God (Christian or otherwise) or in any higher power. I believe we are the product of a series of mutations, enabling the ‘fittest’ to survive, though I do not believe humans are the ultimate beings. I believe we are part of a larger ecosystem and no living creature is above the other, though people certainly act like humans are the dominant creature. I suspect that somewhere along the way we’ll find a way to destroy ourselves—maybe even our planet. If we destroy ourselves, I suspect vegetation and animal life will repopulate the earth; whether humans ever re-emerge again, who knows.
Meaning: Plenty of people tell me that without God there is
no meaning to life, and I disagree. Humanity is special, not because God
created us all with a special purpose, but because we didn’t have to be.
Through a series of mutations, humans evolved into what we are today, proving
that we were better fit to navigate the world than previous humanlike primates.
Still others ask if we evolved from monkeys, why are there still monkeys. And
those people clearly don’t know how evolution works. It happens over millions
of years, very slowly, mutating and branching off into new species. Other
primates were equally good at surviving and so their species was sustained. The
same with humans. But I digress. I believe humanity is special because we are
sort of ‘happy accidents’; mortality makes it special too. We’re born with a
certain, undesignated, amount of time to live and to create our own meaning. We
find what means the most to us and strive to create a life around it. Most
humans want to help others in some way—be it art, science, philosophy,
psychology, civil service, etc. I believe humanity’s purpose is to look out for
each other and to love each other and ensure the species’ survival. In the
evolutionary sense at least. We find our own reasons to live and to make our
difference in the world.
Morality: I’ve also been told that without God there can be
no morals, or that, as an atheist, I must have no morals. And I again disagree.
I believe in love, hope, honor, loyalty, honesty, trust, respect, etc. Those
things don’t come from God. They come from within and from human interaction.
They are not imposed on us by some invisible spirit. To me, if you need God to
tell you what’s wrong or right, and you can’t figure it out on your own, then
you may be part of the problem. Also, I find that excessively religious people
try to pass off their own opinions of morality as God’s will or God’s word or
God speaking through them. It seems as if they’re trying to justify their own
hatefulness. Also, basing morality off of an ancient text written by
superstitious people who had vastly different values (slavery, women as
reproductive beings only, myths about how crops appeared or weather changed,
etc) seems absurd, as does picking and choosing the parts we agree with and
want to practice. Do we still follow the Malleus Maleficarum? Of course
not. Because that’s of a time when
people believed different things, superstitious, irrational things. They
condemned things out of fear, because they didn’t understand it. I’m a firm
believer in “Just because you can’t explain it, doesn’t mean God did it.”
Destiny: To be honest, I don’t know that I believe in
destiny. It’s a nice thought to believe that everything happens for a reason
and we all have some special purpose, but that also defeats the idea of free
will. It may be comforting to believe that there’s a special plan for each of
us, but it’s illogical and superstitious, and doesn’t allow for people to take
responsibility for their own lives.
The Christian Perspective:
Justin Steckbauer, Liberty University
Origin: The question of origin has puzzled man kind for centuries. How did we get here? Where did we come from? How did life come to be? For the Christian, the action and the process by which life came about, the length of years it took, the exact biological functions that brought about the complex human life form are less important than the first cause. Micro evolution, small changes in species that provide for adaptation, is beyond dispute. That is something science can measure and observe. In fact, I love science. However, macro evolution seems highly speculative, and the processes by which a puddle of amino acids could become a highly complex life form like a human are not observable. Given chance, matter, and time, a puddle of amino acids will never, ever become a human being. It is simply impossible, statistically. For the atheist, the first cause is a vacuum, an unanswered question: Where did energy come from? For the Christian, the first cause is a loving architect of the universe, a necessary first cause who over 10,000 years or 7 billion years, crafted the universe into existence.
Meaning: The question of meaning in Christianity is simple: We are children of the loving biologist, chemist, artist, writer, and architect, the designer of the human soul, who we call Father God. In that context, every human being has value, incredible value, so much that God would come, Jesus Christ, to offer himself as a path of redemption for his wayward people. In addition meaning, for the Christian, is a stark reality: The Earth is a very troubled place, and the problem is not outside ourselves, but within ourselves, and the only treatment is the indwelling presence of Jesus. In the context of meaning, we find a treasure trove in the Bible of meaning, and inherent worth.
Morality: What is the perfect moral code? Who had it? What does each moral code look like when put it into practical application? For atheism, we see Nazi Germany, with Nietzsche's idea of the superman put into practice. Genocide. Again in Russia, Stalin a former seminary student turned atheist, what do we find? The writing of Karl Marx used for the purpose of subjugation. Genocide. And what about the Christian worldview? The most prosperous countries on planet Earth, in contrast: Europe, and the United States. Now we see in the 21st century as Europe and the United States drift into post-modernism and naturalism, corruption begins to grow like a cancer.
The teaching of Jesus Christ is the perfection of morality described in powerfully simple terms: Love God and love others, as you love yourself. Jesus Christ provides the model for a life of humble service to others, that will always bring about the most peaceable and prosperous paradise, when practiced in truth.
Destiny: What future does an atheist have, after 100 years have passed? After 1000 years have gone by? The atheist passes out of existence into the natural and biological cycles of the environment. What future does the Christian have? Unending life, in community with a loving God and fellow believers who have chosen to fly in the face of everything the world says, and do it the way God says. Jesus Christ provides the way, he is the road, a personal savior present, willing to show you the hard truth about yourself, and offer a way of total redemption and a future unimaginably wonderful.
Conclusion:
Thank you for reading. An open and respectful dialogue is vital to the ongoing discussions and debates between Christians and atheists as we attempt to navigate and make sense of things in a difficult world. Respect, love, and mutual admiration can go a long way to healing wounds and bringing otherwise diverse groups into reasonable social harmony. Take care and God bless. Related Posts:
Secular Views vs. Christian Truth
The Power of Love in Western Culture
Outlook for a Revived American Christianity
Questions on Salvation and God
Processing the Past and Being Restored
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)













